Showing posts with label Donna Gores posts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donna Gores posts. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Topeka Kansas: Successfully Votes Making "Domestic Violence Legal"



By Susan Murphy Milano


In Topeka, Kansas on October 11, 2011, members of the City Council voted and successfully repealed the city's ordinance banning domestic violence during National Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Talk about a punch, a kick and slap for victims of intimate partner violence by city government’s financial misconduct as their excuse for not wanting to do their jobs. At the center of dysfunction, the absent District Attorney Chad Taylor, who is refusing to prosecute domestic violence crimes in the city.

During the two hour televised council meeting, the one sided discussion from 7 of the 10 elected members amounted to nothing more than political finger pointing. Leading the charge, and ultimately dictating the vote, was Interim City Manager Dan Stanley, brow beating those during the hearing into submission of his way or the highway. It was classic manipulation "101" presented in a live stream real time format.

According to National Advocate, organizer and expert Claudine Dombrowski, in attendance at the City Council meeting, “I witnessed the Council of elected officials support the decriminalization of domestic violence within the city limits of Topeka and berate speakers, who were survivors and victims. The elected council members temper tantrums during the meeting and finger pointing were disgusting.”

Approximately 24 years ago, after years of lobbying by victims, advocates and families of those slain by their partner, legislation was signed by Governors nation-wide making domestic violence a crime. The pen used to sign the bill, was not filled with ink, but the blood of all those who lives were lost at the hands of those professing to love them.

This "stunt" today will cost Topeka more than the mere 10% budget shortfall cited by city officials as the reason not to prosecute. Expect an increase in intimate partner related missing persons cases (providing they will still be allowed to make a report) and count on more funerals for those victims whom the police did not respond.

This certainly gives new meaning to creating prevention and awareness during National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, doesn't it?




· “16,800 homicides (that are reported) attributed to intimate partner homicide per year, 2.2 million medically treated injuries costing $37 BILLION per year.

· The cost of intimate partner violence exceeds $5.8 billion dollars each year; $4.1 billion of which is for medical and mental health services.”

· Almost one-third of female homicide victims that are reported in police records are killed by an intimate partner.

· In 70-80% of intimate partner homicides, no matter which partner was killed, the man physically abused the woman before the murder.

· Less than one-fifth of victims reporting an injury from intimate partner violence sought medical treatment following the injury.

· Intimate partner violence results in more than 18.5 million mental health care visits each year.

NCDAV reporting sourced from: The Cost of Violence in the United States. 2007. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centers for Injury Prevention and Control. Atlanta, GA
NCDAV reporting sourced from: The Cost of Violence in the United States. 2007. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centers for Injury Prevention and Control. Atlanta, GA
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports “Crime in the United States, 2000,” (2001)
NCDAV report sourced from: Campbell, et al. (2003). “Assessing Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide.” Intimate Partner Homicide, NIJ Journal, 250, 14-19. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Intimate Partner Violence in the United States,” December 2006

Costs of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in the United States. 2003.

****

Susan Murphy Milano is a staff member of the Institute for Relational Harm Reduction and Public Pathology Education. She is a specialist with intimate partner violence prevention strategies and high risk cases and available for personal consultations through the Institute. She is also part of the team at Management Resources Limited of New York.

Susan is the author of "Time's Up: A Guide on How to Leave and Survive Abusive and Stalking Relationships,"Moving out, Moving on, and Defending Out Lives. Susan is the host of The Susan Murphy Milano Show, "Time's Up!" . She is a regular contributor to the nationally syndicated "The Roth Show" with Dr Laurie Roth and a co-host on Crime Wire.






Wednesday, June 1, 2011

A Plea to Stop Using Craig’sList in Favor of SafeList


By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

In the aftermath of Donna Jou’s disapperance and possible murder, another example of the predatory behavior of Craig’s List looms large…..  (See Garrett Berki story below)

Reza Jou found a solution to the lack of security  problem that contributed to the  in the form of a blog posting from a businessman named Karim Pirani, the president and founder of SafeList.com, a website that requires users to submit to questions to confirm who they are before gaining access to the site's core features.

Pirani came up with the idea not because of a personal tragedy but because he saw a market disconnect with sites like craigslist.org.

"If you see a must-have item on eBay, what do you do?" Pirani asked rhetorically. "You look up the seller's ratings, you then can buy through PayPal, which gives you a certain amount of protection. Craigslist has no PayPal, so a transaction is like Russian roulette. People are nonchalant where they should be vigiliant."

To become a verified user of SafeList, individuals must submit themselves to a series of questions based on their personal life history that the system pulls from a comprehensive public database. They must correctly answer these questions within 240 seconds.

In addition, failure to respond correctly will keep the person at the basic user level, and SafeList will also report any convicted felon or sexual predator that attempts to register on the website to law enforcement.

***Currently, SafeList is available only in San Diego, but other West Coast cities are expected to be added in 2011.

About SafeList Ventures
SafeList Ventures, Inc. a privately held start-up, is working to make online classified advertising safer and more secure. The SafeList.com portal provides a “one click” ID verification and criminal background check, allowing members of its community, both individuals and merchants, to interact within a safer online marketplace. To learn more about the company, please visit its website at www.safelist.com.


Calling for Justice for Garrett-San Diego Style

An 18-year-old Mission Beach man was shot and killed and three 17-year-old boys were arrested Wednesday night in Paradise Hills after a Craigslist deal turned into a robbery, San Diego police said. Family and friends identified the victim as Garrett Berki, a 2010 La Jolla High School graduate who was attending Mesa College.


Three teenagers charged in the shooting death of Garrett Burki stood in court during their arraignment. The judge ordered not to show their faces.

San Diego police said, family and friends identified the victim as Garrett Berki, a 2010 La Jolla High School graduate who was attending Mesa College.

Vigil held for teen slain answering Craigslist ad

SAN DIEGO — Three San Diego teenagers accused in the death of an 18-year-old man who was robbed and shot after he responded to a Craigslist ad for a $600 computer pleaded not guilty Friday to murder and other felony charges.

Rashon Abernathy, Seandell Jones and Shaquille Jordan, all 17, also face counts of robbery and shooting into an occupied vehicle, as well as gun and gang allegations. They have been charged as adults.

If convicted, they each face a potential prison sentence of 50 years to life.

Dressed in orange Juvenile Hall-issued clothing, the three teens stood together Friday in front of a San Diego Superior Court judge to answer to the charges. One looked down at the floor as attorneys asked for appropriate bail amounts, given the seriousness of the case and available information about the boys, such as their criminal histories, if any.

Judge Joseph Brannigan ordered the teens held in lieu of $5 million bail.

Defense attorney Kevin Milmoe had asked that bail be set at $1 million each, adding that two of the boys — Abernathy and Jordan — did not have criminal records. A prosecutor asked for $2 million bail.

The teens are accused in the Wednesday night shooting of Garrett Berki of Mission Beach. Berki was a 2010 La Jolla High School graduate and was attending Mesa College.

San Diego police said Berki went with his girlfriend to Casey Street off Alta View Drive in Paradise Hills shortly before 10:30 p.m. to buy an item that was advertised for sale on the Craigslist website. Deputy District Attorney Kristian Trocha told the judge the item was a computer.

The couple met three teens who pretended to be sellers, and one of the three produced a handgun.

The robbers took cash and cellphones from the couple and drove away in a green Honda Accord. Berki and his girlfriend followed the Honda to try to get its license plate number.

Authorities said the Honda driver, identified as Jones, pulled onto Artemia Way, a cul-de-sac, and turned the car around. Berki then tried to “box in” the Honda but was unsuccessful.

As the Honda passed the couple’s car, someone inside the suspect vehicle fired a single shot, hitting Berki in the chest. The driver of the Honda kept going, jumped a curb about two blocks away and crashed at the end of Fleming Drive.

The driver and passengers got out and ran.

Officers found three suspects minutes later, hiding in backyards about a block away.

Trocha said Abernathy is believed to be the shooter. Investigators recovered a computer and an expended .45-caliber shell casing.

The prosecutor said all three defendants are members or affiliates of a southeastern San Diego gang. Only only one of them has been documented as such by police.

Mothers of two of the teens said after the hearing that they were sorry for Berki and his family but stressed that their sons did not fire the fatal shot.

Patricia Dykes said police told her that her son, Shaquille Jordan, was in the car Wednesday night when the robbery occurred.

Both she and Shearese Johnson, mother of Seandell Jones, described their sons as good students who were poised to graduate this year from local charter schools.

“I just want my son back safely with me,” Johnson said.About 100 people gathered Thursday night at a vigil for Berki at Mission Beach, including his father, mother and sister. Berki has four siblings.

dana.littlefield@uniontrib.com • (619) 293-1287 • Twitter @danalittlefield

Donna R. Gore, M.A., aka "Lady Justice," is a homicide survivor and victim's advocate, and so much more!  To learn more about Donna, please visit her website:  www.donnagore.com

Friday, April 29, 2011

California Earthquake Effect---- Que Sera Sera (And the Life of an Advocate)





By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

Resiliency, a positive attitude, the end of complacency and apathy… empathy and compassion… these are in the toolbox of every Advocate.

Being an advocate for whatever great caus(es) you may choose can be like being in the middle of a natural disaster…at the human level, if you do not have mutual cooperation and motivation.    Whether it is crime victim issues, human rights, the environment, educational issues… you name it!  If you do the job correctly, there is change, and a result you may not have anticipated.

What drives us to the call to sacrifice time, food, sleep, creature comforts and social time, can be a passion for some.

The “human disaster” of another energizes us to action, urging us on to “right a wrong” for the benefit of others. Truth is, by the time we find our true advocacy role, it is often too late for ourselves.

Why not rest on our laurels and be proud that we have survived our own personal tsunami and come out the other side okay… in time?  Why not bask in our past accomplishments and just sit back and enjoy?   We are driven to do for others…

And we indeed have assisted others in the many natural disasters that have occurred in the past few years around the world. Good people have endured tsunamis, floods, famine, fires, industrial explosions, terrorism, snowstorms of epic proportions and yes, earthquakes.  

This blogger asks, how do people prepare for a real natural disaster that they know may arrive?  I have always admired those who do… such as those resilient laid back Californians “on the virtual verge” of an earthquake that could arrive at any time with little notice. They have it down to a science.  What are a few rumblings and broken dishes?  They know what to do and where to take cover.

(*** Consider that this is the first “Easter anniversary” of one of the most devastating earthquakes in the Imperial Valley area of California in 2010 on the Mexican border where some of my amigos and amigas reside...).  They have partially recovered and would do better, but for a devastating economy as well.   They pick up the pieces, do their best work and start again… Que Sera, Sera.   We advocates do the best work we can one person at a time, and then move on to the next person, problem or crisis.

There is no better example of the California attitude sung by MAMA CASS in this “funky and coolish” song called “California Earthquake”.  Take 3 minutes and 21 seconds to enjoy her take on their oh so familiar natural disaster.

So….LISTEN UP BLOGGERS!







Donna R. Gore, Homicide Survivor, Victim's Rights Advocate, aka "Lady Justice"
http://donnagore.wordpress.com




 

Friday, April 1, 2011

A Final Act in San Diego by “The Terminator Governor”



By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

“Double, Double Toil and Trouble… Fire Burn and Cauldron Bubble….”

Is this refrain from a chorus of California outraged citizens and lawmakers or could it be from William Shakespeare’s, Macbeth????

Well, my dear bloggers, I invite you to be the judge…..

Consider this…. We may have the makings of a witches brew for sure…

‘Just the Facts, Ma’am…(as reported by a variety of San Diego and Los Angeles new sources)

1) A well connected Governor on his way out who, along with increasing the State deficit by billions, was frequently “all show and little substance”;
2) A desire by a group of guys to party beyond their geographic confines of Sacramento fueled by alcohol;
3) The denial of entry into a fraternity party;
4) A 22 year old San Diego State University Student named Luis Santos is seemingly in the wrong place at the wrong time, the apartment of his cousin;
5) A fatal stabbing and wounding of three others occurs;
6) A young thug, Ryan Jett, who had previous felony convictions
and was on probation for having a sawed-off shotgun and possessing ammunition at the time of the killing;
7) The defendants originally charged with murder, assault, vandalism, conspiracy to commit an assault and conspiracy to destroy evidence.  Had they been convicted, they both would have faced 25 years to life behind bars.  Now a politically tied defendant may serve only 7 years;
8) A crime victims’ advocacy group called “Crime Victims United California” had the foresight and proactive style to file a civil law suit  on behalf of the Santos family against Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation;
9) The arrogance of a Governor clearly shone through by violating the family's constitutional rights under Marsy's Law by illegally commuting the sentence for Esteban Nunez from 16 years to 7 years on his last day in office;
(Fabian Nunez, a Democrat, served as Assembly speaker from 2004 to 2008. He is also a business partner of the governor's top political adviser at the consulting firm Mercury Public Affairs, according to the Los Angeles Times)
10) San Diego prosecutors state that they are unaware of any other case in which a defendant who entered a plea agreement later had his sentence reduced by commutation.
11) A prime opportunity to showcase Marsy’s Law exists;
(***Please refer to details regarding the 2008 California Marsy’s Law at the end of this blog….)
12) This victim’s family was never notified that a defendant’s original sentence was being commuted and found out via news reportsin direct violation of the California Constitution and statutory authority.
13) Family members of a former state assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez appeared to care only for the creature comforts of their felonious relative, Esteban, by sending him an electronic Kindle that was confiscated by prison staff;
14) A shocked San Diego County District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis:"It re-victimizes Luis's family, his parents, it blindsided the District Attorney's Office, and it undermined the criminal justice system.”
"We wanted to make sure that crime victims and prosecutors are notified within a defined time frame when an application for commutation is made in the future," Dumanis said;
15) Another lawsuit may take place as District Attorney Dumanis said her office may also file a lawsuit in the matter.
16) The potential  birth of new legislation Assembly Bill 648 by Assembly member Nathan Fletcher (AD-75) and Assembly member Marty Block
(AD-78) (As of February 18, 2011)
AB 648 would require that the applicant of a commutation notify the district attorney of the county where the conviction occurred of their intent to apply for a commutation, 30 days before the Governor acts. Current law only requires the district attorney to be notified in the case of a pardon.
The bill would also authorize the district attorney to submit a written recommendation to the Governor for or against a pardon or commutation of sentence. The bill would further require the district attorney to notify the victim of the crime and their family, and allow those individuals to submit a recommendation to the Governor for or against a pardon or commutation of sentence.
AB 648 requires a majority vote by both the Assembly and the Senate and Signature by the new Governor, Jerry Brown.
17) Judge Robert F. O’Neill told Nunez during sentencing that his actions after the crime showed a "callousness to human life -- evil."
18) Defendant Ryan Jett, at the time of sentencing tells the judge that “he will spend the rest of his life honoring Santos' memory.”

Details of the Case:
Just when we think we have a little piece of justice after the arduous investigative and judicial processes are completed, an outgoing Governor rips out the hearts of the Santos family of San Diego, (just like his Terminator character) for a political favor….

Kathy and Fred Santos are the bereaved parents of slain San Diego State University student Luis Santos.  This tragedy occurred on October 22, 2008 when Luis was a 22 year old at San Diego Mesa College was targeted by four others.

A witness told detectives that Santos said carried a "piece" and wouldn't back down from anyone, and apparently the defendants' group overheard the remarks. After one of the victims cried out "I've been stabbed," Nunez was overheard to say, "Yeah, I got one of 'em," DiCarlo told the judge.

According to court testimony, Esteban Nunez and Ryan Jett, along with Raphael Garcia, traveled from Sacramento to San Diego to party and picked up Leshanor Thomas along the way. Witnesses testified they set upon Santos and several other people after they were denied entry to a fraternity party.
Two co-defendants, 20-year-old Rafael Garcia and 21-year-old Leshanor Thomas, pleaded guilty earlier to lesser charges.

Garcia, of Sacramento, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to destroy evidence and agreed to cooperate with the prosecution. He faced up to three years in prison at his June 24 sentencing.

Thomas, also from Sacramento, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit an assault and assault with a deadly weapon and faced nearly five years behind bars.

A judge last year found that Nunez, Garcia and Jett were "talking smack" and "looking for trouble" at the apartment of Garcia's cousin in the hours leading up to the fatal stabbing.

Defense attorneys contended their clients were acting in self-defense after a fight broke out. Santos was stabbed once in the heart," the prosecutor said, adding that the victims were unarmed. After the killing, the defendants drove back to Sacramento returned home burning their bloody clothes and threw their knives into a river.

"They're all principals," DiCarlo said. "It doesn't matter if one wasn't armed.
Jett's attorney, Terry Zimmerman, said her client believed he had to defend himself as the fight broke out. Zimmerman said both Santos and Jett were both good young men.

"This was a situational event fueled by alcohol," Zimmerman told the judge. "This was not a premeditated act."

"Had they not all acted together, Luis would still be alive," Deputy District Attorney Jill DiCarlo said.  DiCarlo said the notion that Jett showed restraint by only stabbing Santos once was "absurd." Santos was fatally stabbed once in the heart," the prosecutor said, adding that the victims were unarmed.  Garcia and Thomas pleaded guilty to lesser charges.

Defense attorney Brad Patton said Nunez's sentence was too harsh and Schwarzenegger's commutation corrected an injustice.

But Luis Santos' mother, Kathy, who lives in Concord, said Schwarzenegger's action was strictly a political act.

She said her son was “the entertainer in the family and a people-magnet."
"We had a perfect family of four," she told the defendants. "You stole a very important part of our family. I hope you will suffer forever more."

Fred Santos, father of Luis, said the bill is not intended to take away the governor's power to grant clemency in certain cases.

"We just want transparency, we want notification," he said. "Give everybody a chance to comment before a decision is made rather than doing this in a sneaky way like this was done."

Marsey’s Law: California’s Victims’ Bill of Rights

Marsy’s Law significantly expands the rights of victims in California. Under Marsy’s Law, the California Constitution article I, § 28, section (b) now provides victims with the following enumerated rights:

To be treated with fairness and respect for his or her privacy and dignity, and to be free from intimidation, harassment, and abuse, throughout the criminal or juvenile justice process.
To be reasonably protected from the defendant and persons acting on behalf of the defendant.
To have the safety of the victim and the victim’s family considered in fixing the amount of bail and release conditions for the defendant.
To prevent the disclosure of confidential information or records to the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, which could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victim’s family or which disclose confidential communications made in the course of medical or counseling treatment, or which are otherwise privileged or confidential by law.

To refuse an interview, deposition, or discovery request by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, and to set reasonable conditions on the conduct of any such interview to which the victim consents.

To reasonable notice of and to reasonably confer with the prosecuting agency, upon request, regarding, the arrest of the defendant if known by the prosecutor, the charges filed, the determination whether to extradite the defendant, and, upon request, to be notified of and informed before any pretrial disposition of the case.

To reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present and of all parole or other post-conviction release proceedings, and to be present at all such proceedings.

To be heard, upon request, at any proceeding, including any delinquency proceeding, involving a post-arrest release decision, plea, sentencing, post-conviction release decision, or any proceeding in which a right of the victim is at issue.

To a speedy trial and a prompt and final conclusion of the case and any related post-judgment proceedings.

To provide information to a probation department official conducting a pre-sentence investigation concerning the impact of the offense on the victim and the victim’s family and any sentencing recommendations before the sentencing of the defendant.

To receive, upon request, the pre-sentence report when available to the defendant, except for those portions made confidential by law.

To be informed, upon request, of the conviction, sentence, place and time of incarceration, or other disposition of the defendant, the scheduled release date of the defendant, and the release of or the escape by the defendant from custody.

To restitution.
It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.
Restitution shall be ordered from the convicted wrongdoer in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed, in which a crime victim suffers a loss.

All monetary payments, monies, and property collected from any person who has been ordered to make restitution shall be first applied to pay the amounts ordered as restitution to the victim.

To the prompt return of property when no longer needed as evidence.

To be informed of all parole procedures, to participate in the parole process, to provide information to the parole authority to be considered before the parole of the offender, and to be notified, upon request, of the parole or other release of the offender.

To have the safety of the victim, the victim’s family, and the general public considered before any parole or other post-judgment release decision is made.

To be informed of the rights enumerated in paragraphs (1) through (16).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



As we stand by for the next chapter, will the Santos Family receive a little piece of justice that was stolen from them?   I don’t know….

Double, Double Toil and Trouble… Fire Burn and Cauldron Bubble….
Governor Jerry Brown’s Contact information is:
Governor Jerry Brown
c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160



Donna R. Gore, M.A. 
http://donnagore.wordpress.com

Friday, March 4, 2011

Vulnerabilities: Dealing with the Pain, the Aftermath


By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

It is intriguing to me what the “residual effects” are on those who experience violent crime. Whether your case is brand new, going through the judicial process at a snail’s pace; whether you are left hanging and left wondering for years with an unsolved case; if your case has been solved…. Or if, as in my situation, you are many years down the road after “the event,” vulnerabilities pervade and often last a life time.

The circumstances of crime can be as individual and varied as a fingerprint. For every instance in which we achieve a sense of contentment, we can also find an opposing state of discomfort that serves to remind us of the past…

Dr. Elisabeth Kubler- Ross will forever be known as the pioneer who made sense of it all with her five stages of grief model, featured in her 1969 breakthrough book, “On Death & Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses , Clergy and their Families.” Death, Denial, Isolation, Anger, Bargaining Depression and Acceptance seem to capture the rollercoaster-like stages we all felt or feel.

Today, other professionals including social workers, psychologists and grief counselors grapple with our pain.  They listen to our stories, respond to the questions for which there are answers, and “patch us up” as best they can, hoping that we have the fortitude to face the future.

Cognitive therapy focuses on changing behaviors in the here and now. The techniques used, help to change behaviors and feelings. They have been categorized into “schemas” developed by Dr. Jeffrey Young. Reportedly, a schema is a “life trap” preventing us from accomplishing life goals and subsequent happiness.

Among the 18 different schemas, some include: emotional deprivation, mistrust/abuse, dependence/incompetence and self-sacrifice. Vulnerability is one of the common “life traps” defined as, “the sense that the world is a dangerous place; that disaster can happen at any time, and that you will be overwhelmed by the challenges that lie ahead.”

Somehow, vulnerability is put in a far more serious, dark, gloom and doom context rather that the vulnerability we see on TV. You know the one… “I just broke up with my boyfriend and I’m feeling vulnerable.” Perhaps those TV writers need to say heartbroken rather than vulnerable... It certainly sounds scary… “anything can happen”… “overwhelming”.

Let’s be real. We are in fact, reeling, heartbroken and feeling very vulnerable concerning the horrific acts of a deranged gunman against Congresswoman Giffords and the other fine public servants and innocent citizens who lost their lives in Tucson recently. Vulnerability to the max!

I am sickened how this event has served to invade our personal freedoms and tainted all that is good about public service and a sense of community…. Not to mention the criminal acts. Mental illness is no excuse. Don’t even try to make this political or talk about the media frenzy or civility. This was intentional murder!

However, I refuse to live a life “looking over my shoulder”, thus giving power to the perpetrator of my father’s homicide.

Vulnerability, at its most basic level, is like an open wound that never heals. It’s hard to control a small vulnerability, akin to a scratch, let’s say, from becoming a gaping wound. Personally speaking, with nearly 30 years time and a lot of therapy, my gaping wounds have healed, but not totally.

So where do we put the remaining pain and how do we deal with it afterwards? Can we as survivors of homicide or otherwise actually re-adjust to life after homicide? YES WE CAN. But….. those vulnerabilities remain… How do my vulnerabilities translate to my day to day dealings, to my very own “vulnerability schema”?

Well, if you’d really like to know, my blogger friends…..

As a lifelong single woman who just happens to have a physical disability that rarely limits me, due to my superb ability to compensate or “figure out a way,” I feel I am naturally more vulnerable as I “can’t kick an intruder where it hurts” nor can I “run for the hills” quickly. However, I can use a steel crutch as a weapon and well developed upper body strength, if need be…. (I always used to beat the grammar school boys at arm wrestling Ha!)

I can try to always live in a “safe community” (if there is such a place anymore.

As for my crime related vulnerabilities, I always record a new daily message on my answering machine including the date and a couple of details both at home and at work. I do this for two reasons. My main reason for doing so, is to alert others of a clue as to my whereabouts in case of an emergency… or if I went missing. I do this for safety… It would be awhile if they had to discover ‘something not quite right”
My family, for whatever reason, gets together on major holidays only with little communication in between… They have their own families and I do not, except for surrogate family friends. I have accepted this… The second reason for such recordings is my insatiable need for creativity and diversity. I love the creative challenge of devising a new message each and every day.

I never had the opportunity to say goodbye to my father for the final time, as he left from home one evening. Consequently, ever since then, I feel a loss, I feel scared if a family member does not say a formal goodbye at the end of the gathering. I feel cheated and a little panicky. It is one of my vulnerabilities.

My “best work buddy” frequently makes a beeline for the door at the end of the day and does not make a point of saying goodbye to me, as my cubicle is not in her exit path. I don’t like it…. It is my vulnerability showing.

I do a fair amount of driving and always wear my seatbelt, use the sign of the cross as a non- Catholic no less, and silently thank God at times for “keeping me safe” and try to be a safe and considerate driver (with occasional lapses into “road irritation versus rage.” Admittedly, I have an irrational fear of auto fatality or injury.

My father was found shot dead five times to vital organs in his van. Some say it rolled into a house with the motor running for 30 minutes… and house occupants never called the police, after he desperately tried to drive himself to a hospital.

I always lock my car - even in a familiar neighborhood or driveway.

I think this is a holdover from my graduate school days “all by myself” at Kansas State University. Who cares if my sister. Holly makes fun of my behavior…. My vulnerability about crime became more apparent after the following very real case which occurred just one town away from where I reside.
(My heart breaks for Mary Ellen Welsh, who just wanted to have coffee and a visit with her friend, Carol Larese).

(This account was reported by Hartford Courant reporter, By BILL LEUKHARDT on May 29, 2008.)

A convicted sex offender, Leslie Williams, 31 was charged with a March 30 home invasion that left a retired court worker severely wounded and her cancer-stricken friend raped and killed opted in court Wednesday not to have a probable-cause hearing on the evidence used to arrest him.
Williams, released from jail in early March after serving an eight-year term for molesting a child, is being held without bail since his arrest in Watertown on March 30. He was fleeing from police when he lost control of the stolen car, which was owned by one of the victims.

Williams told police he had spent the night sleeping in an unlocked parked car he found in a Woodhaven Drive driveway and picked Larese's nearby home to break into when he saw Welsh park and walk in.
Court records state that Williams burst into the New Britain home of Carol Larese, 65, seconds after her friend Mary Ellen Welsh, 62, had walked in to have coffee with Larese. Williams, who was on a weekend robbery spree and had spent the night sleeping in an unlocked parked car in a nearby driveway, shot Larese in the head and assaulted then abducted Welsh, court records state.

Carol Larese, 65, told police she had just welcomed her friend Welsh into the home when Williams walked in, said he needed a car and money, and showed the women a black handgun, the newly released document says.

Larese said Williams walked behind her into a far corner of the basement and shot her in the head. Williams told police he thought he had killed her.

But Larese, still conscious, pretended to be dead and told police she could hear Williams attack her friend. Larese waited until she no longer heard anyone in the house, then ran across the street to tell a neighbor to call police. By then, Welsh, her car and Williams were gone.

Welsh's body was found in a sand pit in the town of Bristol, CT. Welsh, a cancer patient, had been shot, court records state. Police are still seeking the gun used in the crime.

Sorry bloggers, it’s just my vulnerabilities surfacing about unlocked cars…. These instances alone may not seem like much, but they are enough to keep me in a “vulnerable state of vigilance” throughout the day.

Whether homicide related, disability related or relationship related, vulnerabilities, to paraphrase Carly Simon, are often, “the only thing making us feel we are alive"….‘Guess that’s just how much it costs to survive in this world….

When all is said and done, I guess I’ll keep my vulnerabilities. They make me feel real.

Follow Donna Gore's blog, "Lady Justice"  http://donnagore.wordpress.com

Friday, February 4, 2011

PRISON PROGRAMMING – IS IT A PANACEA?





By Donna R. Gore, M.A. 

I suppose you could call me a state government junkie…as well as an information junkie. As a state employee, I feel it is my duty to keep informed. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that I downgraded my cable service long ago to “basic” to save about $600 a year. Therefore, I watch a lot of political affairs shows interspersed with my Netflix DVDs of choice.

It is a minimalist life, but a fine compromise for me in my considerable quest to change careers and offer my talents and services to the Southern California or San Diego community. (Hopefully, in the near future).

Given the above, I was perfectly content to watch a series of parole hearings sponsored by the State of Connecticut Department of Corrections during a recent Saturday night dinner in front of the TV.

(Author’s Note- There is approximately 3.5 million residents in Connecticut, 19 state prisons and 1 federal prison (not counting county jails).

The hearing consisted of three officers, two male, one female and a parole officer. (Male) As I viewed the parade of offenders, I noted many things of interest to a survivor of violent crime.

Each offender looked similar, and presented similar crimes. However, there was a wide array of articulateness, perceived intelligence or lack thereof, aptitude for verbal expression and motivation. This should come as no surprise when one thinks of the make up of the general population.

The hearing officers, who were doing their job to the best of their ability, went through the procedures in a rather bland and rote manner. They were perfect in their social etiquette, saying “Good morning” to each offender, wishing them a Happy New Year, addressing each by their Sir Name etc.

Questions involved prison behavior, how many infractions they received and why, who was in their life as a support system; inquiring as to their plans for the future, whether they had acquired a GED; what programs they attended and liked best. Occasionally, they asked if “Mr. Offender” had any remorse for their victims.

Time after time, when asked about the programming the offender had participated in, the majority would name one or two programs, followed by:

“I signed up for “X program” but they don’t offer it here” or (more typically) “There is a waiting list of at least a year.”

This author recalls watching many legislative hearings in the past and learning that our state has an excessive number of programs on the books for Connecticut offenders, both within the confines of the cement walls and as part of a non-profit re-entry program into civilized society.

***In fact, the Department of Corrections currently offers an alphabetical compendium of programs listed as “Offender Programs and Victim Services Unit.” Consisting of 264 pages of offerings! Upon close examination, almost without exception they are meant for prisoners and not for the benefit of victims. Granted, not every program is continuously offered…. But still…

Although my allegiance is always for the survivor of crime first and foremost....

What is wrong with the picture I have painted thus far? Plenty! 264 pages and inmates are on waiting lists for a year or more… Why is this so?

At considerable expense, we are supposed to mold offenders into responsible citizens. We clothe, feed, educate, skill train, provide parenting classes, assist in ridding substance abuse and other addictions, provide role models, domestic violence and other forms of counseling, AIDS treatment, mental health remediation, and all other forms of medical, social and emotional treatment necessary.

Why is the wait to rehabilitate so long? I can think of a few reasons…

1) Lack of instructors – A chosen few pursues the calling to work with offenders in these oppressive environments. Most do not;

2) Bottlenecks in the system- You can only re-arrange the deck chairs so many ways. Let’s say a class or training has the capacity for 30 student inmates. Perhaps, for whatever reason, those who qualify withdraw or are de-selected for tickets/infractions. The process may be held up further for approving the next candidates who are waiting because of the actions of others before them. If inmates require these classes for re-entry, another year in prison waiting for a program is indeed a long wait.

3) Supply and Demand- The demand for specific programs is so great in a particular geographic area, that the supply is always far less than the need.

4) Warehousing- Those who would otherwise be in the mainstream of society are taking up prison space and using resources needlessly as they wait for in-house programs, or housing on the outside.

Highly respected and retired DOC Commissioner, Theresa C. Lanz established a priority of supporting offender re-integration when she changed the model from strict confinement to community re-entry under supervision in the mid and late 1990’s. The transitional services overview on the DOC website states, “Since more than 95 percent of offenders (19,000+ currently) will eventually be released from prison, the department already offers extensive educational/vocational, substance abuse, parenting and other programs that will aid in supporting that transition….

A key component is stakeholders-including other state agencies such as the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, the Department of Social Services. the Department of Labor and the Department of Veteran Affairs as well as community based advocacy groups.”

As of January 2009 when the information was updated, those stakeholders contracted just 1,299 halfway house beds and supervised more than 3,500 additional “low risk offenders” in the community. Connecticut has increased its use of mental health professionals in the courts and created increased funding for its diversionary programs.

However, this author’s opinion is that the lack of sufficient beds in the community and the “not in my neighborhood” stance when it comes to group homes and halfway houses often places ex- prisoners in overcrowded homeless shelters.

So, are they left to languish in prison waiting for their required programs to become available, thus getting into further altercations? Or do they hope to transfer to another DOC facility where the program is available so that they can meet the parole rule minimum of 50% incarceration and then into the community with “whatever supports are available” ensuring public safety?

For the blog reader, ‘Just a Sampling of the 264 page program offerings:

Action Drama – A highly acclaimed outreach drama program;

Addiction Services- Tiers I-IV

Administrative Segregation- A Better Way- Video series on life changing behaviors

Career Exploration Fair;

Aids Awareness Group;

Alternatives to Violence- basic, intermediate and advanced

Bicycle and Wheelchair Repair;

Braille Program- Enables inmates in protective custody to be trained as a qualified pool of Braille writers assisting blind people in CT (Overseen by staff at this author’s agency);

Cage your Rage for Women;

Circle of Strength Dual Diagnosis Program;

Cosmetology/Barbering;

Default- Monthly education and therapy group for cancer survivors;

DUI Program;

Empowerment Book Club;

Family Matters- Designed for young men with estranged family relations;

Gambling- The Better Choice Program;

Girl Scouts Behind Bars- Volunteers from the Girl Scouts bring daughters of inmates to the facility for creative activities;

Grief and Adjustment;

Health Lecture Series;

Hospitality Operations Technology- Student preparation work in the hospitality industry;

Incarcerated Veteran’s Program;

Intramural Sports- participants must be ticket free;

Juman- Weekly Islamic worship;

Marker Plate Manufacturing- (Author’s Note- Yes, Virginia, they still make license plates in prison)

Mindful Living Meditation;

Resume Builder-Computer Skills;

V.O.I.C.E.S- Victim- Offender Institutional Correctional Educational Services-

Volunteer supported group to “broaden inmates understanding and sensitivity to the impact of their crime on others.

Wouldn’t it be a wonderful society if, at birth, we had a 264 page list of “programs for life” offered to new parents rather than those for incarcerated people? All of these programs and resources could be put to good use “in preparation for life in the community” from the baby’s and parent’s first coo. The A through Z menu could be used starting with “P” for parenting classes and choosing others along the way as needed, thus virtually eliminating the need for prisons. What a concept!


Donna R. Gore, M. A. "Lady Justice"

Homicide Survivor in Connecticut

Monday, January 3, 2011

Lady Justice, Nancy Grace and Me



By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

Judith Resnik and Dennis Curtis are authors of “Representing Justice.” According to a recent New York Times review, the book is a strange academic marriage of “interviews with contemporary artists and Supreme Court citations.” As a team, they have exhaustively covered the topic of the figure commonly known as “Lady Justice,” the famous blindfolded woman righteously holding a set of scales and sometimes other apparatus…

In ancient Egypt, she was known as “Maat,” Goddess of harmony and order depicted in the “Book of the Dead.” Her scales supposedly weighed a human heart against a feather, to “determine a soul’s fate in the afterlife.”

(Author’s note- How ironic a comparison that, the earthly and frequently unjust decisions regarding survivors of crime frequently could easily “knock one over with a feather” and seemly are totally clueless when it comes to the human heart….)

In ancient Greece, Lady Justice was known as “Themis,” aunt, wife and counselor to Zeus. (Author’s note- We assume that intermarriage was “just and good,” for, according to Greek Mythology, he was the God of the sky and weather and his image appeared on most Greek coins. The people of Greece worshipped this idol as their god. Zeus became one of the Seven Wonders of the World.)

Our omnipresent female figure was also known as “Justitia” – Latin for Lady Justice. LJ embodies a combination of divine order and rightness of law. These attributes include a set of scales, measuring the strength of a case’s support and opposition suspended from her left hand. Her right hand typically holds a double edge sword, thus symbolizing the power of reason and justice.

The Roman depiction of Lady Justice was sometimes portrayed as holding the fasces (i.e. a bundle of rods around an ax) symbolizing judicial authority….and a flame in the other hand, symbolizing truth.
Such descriptions remind this author of another “larger than life figure of American mythology- (i.e. Superman in his everlasting pursuit of Truth, Justice and the American Way…)

It is written that Lady Justice’s blindfold represents objectivity and impartiality. The blindfold itself began to appear in the 15th Century. Since that time, some sculptures have excluded it as redundant because Lady Justice herself acts as a human scale weighing competing claims in each hand. Others have said that her “maidenly form guarantees impartiality.” Still another explanation was that, according to ancient Greeks, her talent to foresee the future made a blindfold unnecessary.

Why all of this historical talk about Lady Justice? When I became a crime victim and eventual survivor of homicide, I was intrigued by these statues of power. They seemed to represent all I stood for or aspired to as a strong gay woman, overcoming so many obstacles over the years with disability and seeking justice for the murder of my father and subsequently a new career goal.

A specific depiction that spoke volumes to me, is the graphic of the Lady Justice statute featured in my last bog, (Voir Dire, Oh Dear!) in which Justitia is seated, holding the scales of justice in her left hand and gently wipes a tear from her cheek with her right hand. Compassion and strength- what a perfect marriage! This statuette is proudly displayed “center stage” in my living room for all to see!

Now, if you will, fast forward with me to the year 2006 or thereabouts. In the middle of our past decade, I was a big fan of the original
Court TV cable show with Nancy Grace, former prosecutor and homicide survivor.

(Author’s note- I would say that in recent years, unfortunately, she appears to have sold her integrity to sensationalism TV with Jerry Springer- like tactics as compared to her Court TV days.) If I am wrong, I will gladly stand corrected. I have not seen much of any daytime TV either Nancy or Oprah, as I am always working…. However, I think, in her heyday, Nancy was an untainted advocate representing all crime victims for a slice of justice.

In Connecticut, we are very fortunate to have the premier crime victim conference in the nation dedicated to the furtherance of education and the providing a platform for retaining the memories of those who have been murdered by violent crime. It is known as the Melanie I. Reiger Memorial Conference named after a young woman and aspiring social worker who was needlessly snuffed out of this life by a former boyfriend. Her parents honor her each year with this wonderful conference.

In 2006, Sam and Wanda Reiger had retained the services of Nancy Grace as keynote speaker in order to share her story as a homicide survivor and later as a highly successful prosecutor, in honor of her former fiancé. As it turns out, her keynote speech was very effective, touching, and powerful. Nancy told her story of a small town southern girl who had hopes of being an English teacher, whose world was turned upside down and forever changed with the murder of her fiancé.

Coincidentally, I had located the lovely and poignant “Crying Lady Justice” statuette and was contemplating its purchase before the conference. I was excited about the prospect of meeting Nancy Grace and hearing her story. And then the idea came to me…. Eureka! Why not purchase a second statuette for Nancy as a way of thanking her on behalf of all Connecticut crime victims. It seemed like another $70 to $100 was well worth the cause.
To me, it seemed to be perfect. Nancy was the epitome of Lady Justice after all. However, the best laid plans…. The conference agenda was set with no time to spare. So, I would have to do a personal hand off in the hall of the Department of Correction’s Auditorium.
(Not exactly how I pictured it).

Indeed, Nancy was surrounded by a flock of fans. In hindsight, I should have removed “LJ” from her box rather than explaining the reason for it. Nancy thanked me in a harried way and handed “the box” to her producer. I remember asking for a contact to follow-up, but none was given.

I have no idea where Nancy’s “master of justice, divine order and prophecy” is today. Is it on her coffee table at home, at her office or used as a conversation piece? Hopefully, it speaks to her as it does to me… Such was our close encounter survivor to survivor. I never received, nor did I expect a Hallmark card in return… but it would have been nice, to say the least!

I may try to contact Nancy in the future. If I do, she may just remember me as the “Connecticut based “Lady Justice.”

Should any Time’s Up blog readers/writers have interest in viewing one sample collection of these fine examples of judicial symbolism, click on: http://mdean.tripod.com/justice.html
There are many different versions of the image of the Goddess of Justice that can be found on the internet, after clicking on in the links below. To avoid pop-up ads, you may wish to open the links using the right button on your mouse and clicking on 'open new window’.

Indeed, justice is always a double edged sword!


Respectfully Submitted,

Donna R. Gore, M. A.
Homicide Survivor in Connecticut
January 1, 2011

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Voir Dire, Oh Dear!



By Donna R. Gore, M.A.

(Instructions in the Voir Dire Criminal Jury Process- Judicial Branch State of Connecticut)

“In a moment I will excuse you from the courtroom. Then each of you will be invited back into the courtroom one by one. (Author’s emphasis) You will be seated in the witness box and each of the lawyers will ask you question. If you do not understand the question, just say so and the lawyer will re-state it for you. Remember please, there are no right or wrong answers to these questions. In response to each question, simply give your honest response. That is all that is needed. The purpose of this questioning process is to permit the lawyers to and their clients to decide if they wish you to be a juror in this particular case.

Before I excuse you, the attorneys will introduce themselves and each of them will make brief comments to you. They will read you a list of names of people who are in some way connected to this case, or who may come before the court as a witness. Listen carefully to the list to see if you know any of them. If you do, do not talk to others about it, but let me know when you come back on your own.

While you are under consideration as a juror in this case, do not discuss the case or reasons why you cannot serve with the others on the voir dire panel. There will be (six/twelve) jurors and two alternate jurors selected for this case.” 




The above instructions are supposedly written as if spoken/written by the presiding judge and written in a concrete and generic manner such that all prospective jurors can understand. (However, this author could argue that it could be written with better quality and clarity.) (i.e. “Let me know when you come back on your own…..” could be clarified to state, “Please inform me when you return to be questioned individually, that you may know one of the participants”.

No matter, this is not a writer’s guide and it is well known attorneys are more accustomed to writing legislative gobbledygook.

I digress from the point, that these instructions are very unique regarding voir dire procedures. *** In fact, the State of Connecticut in its most judicial and thorough manner decided long ago to be the only state in the country that guarantees each attorney the right to question potential jurors individually in State Court trials rather than the more efficient “group of box voir dire” procedure.

Connecticut has the unenviable reputation for having the slowest jury process among all 50 states. (CT General Statutes 54-82f guarantees the right to examine “… each juror outside the presence of other jurors.” Although group voir dire has been used in Federal cases or private practice since 2004, there has been an apprehension to change the statutory guarantee of juror questioning in isolation. In addition, it is extremely expensive and inefficient.

Well known Connecticut Criminal Defense Attorney, Norm Pattis, a defender of the underdog and down trodden defendants writes about this process in the CT Law Tribune, January 2010.

He refers to the trial involving my friend and fellow homicide survivor, Dr. Bill Petit, Jr. Attorney Pattis states, “Ice is melting in a New Haven Courtroom and the world has turned out to watch… Potential jurors will be summoned to court, indoctrinated, and then subjected to questioning by each side. Jury selection alone could take months.” (Author’s Note: In fact, jury selection began on January 19, 2010 and ended on June 2nd. )

In addition to juror selection in isolation, other defendant imposed delays contributed to the torturous process for the Petit family and Connecticut citizenry.

Ne’er do well, hopelessly misunderstood and desperately drug addicted (or wanting to be drugged) defendant Hayes thought he could call the shots and manipulate the system, even requesting to “skip jury selection.” The epitome of arrogance! In the end, he could not.

The first delay occurred on Feb. 1, when Hayes was found unconscious in his prison cell after taking an overdose of prescription medication. Hayes' attorneys argued that his living conditions in prison were "inhumane," with a subsequent hearing held about the defense allegations.

On March 15, jury selection resumed, but was suspended again when Judge Blue ordered a mental health exam to determine whether Hayes was competent to stand trial. Once the court deemed he was competent, lawyers began selecting jurors again in early April. As of June 2nd, a total of 48 selection days, a panel of 12 regular jurors, six alternates, and two backup alternates were selected.

In the mix there were jurors who were excused… and even a brief hospital stay for the judge for which he profusely apologized. Prosecutors began presenting evidence in the case Sept. 13.

According to newspaper accounts, in the Steven Hayes trial, attorneys for the prosecution and defense were each allowed 38 peremptory challenges (Objections to retain the juror). Public defenders used 30 challenges while prosecutors used 29. When interviewed, Dr. Petit offered that in his opinion, 25 to 30 excellent jurors were excused in the process.

Getting back to the voire dire process itself… those who support this notion of sequestering and questioning individual juror done by one state that the potential juror, “would not be as candid” in their response if they were subjected to group observation. Another supposed reason is that a prospective juror may “make a declaration that taints the panel.”

Attorney Pattis and others beg to differ stating, “… Examining jurors in a setting where they can share their views with their peers is just as likely to foster candor. Those with sensitive issues to raise can always request a sidebar… better serving the juror’s privacy.” Attorney Pattis’ solution is to repeal the legislation or amend the state constitution.

As a homicide survivor, I have not been totally exempted from mailings and the initial jury selection process. I have been told that I could be requested to serve on a civil jury versus a criminal case if I made it through the voir dire process.

(Whether a violent crime survivor should be considered for any type of jury is a topic for another blog and serves to expose the inefficiencies of their computer systems, sharing of information and lists upon which they draw names, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles, and voter registration.)

During my last voir dire experience, when it was learned that I was a homicide survivor involving a defendant who was accused of robbery, (as was the current defendant,) a peremptory challenge was issued by the defense. My excusal may have been for other reasons such as not giving the “true answer” to the difference between “being innocent and being found not guilty.”

Upon reflection, I know the difference. However, while seated in the witness box, it sounded like a trick question to me… Perhaps I was excused as I volunteered to the judge in good conscience that although I wanted to perform my duty, my future career goal was to be a Victim Advocate by occupation… which clearly draws the line in the sand as to which side you lean toward.

What about the financial cost of juror participation? In Connecticut, if you are employed full time, your employer must pay you your regular wages for the first five days of jury service (anything more than 30 hours per week.) If you do not work full time, the State must pay you up to $50.00 per day for out of pocket expenses (with proper documentation) for the first five days of jury service only.

Starting on the sixth day of service, the state pays all jurors $50.00 per day and each subsequent day of service.

Let’s see, including the court costs, initial enormous jury pool, that’s 48 selection days X 12 jurors and two alternates. Whew! No wonder the State of Connecticut is in severe deficit!

As for the length, and content of actual questioning, it could be pared down in scope of to exclude, for example, questioning about the occupations of all family members.

Formulating questions to get biases can be a slippery slope. Only those most obvious are ever revealed in the span of time given. Jurors may intentionally make biased statements in hopes of being excused immediately. However, judicial personnel are not easily fooled. Those preemptory challenges are used strategically.

There are many criminal justice reforms that were put on the legislative books following the 2007 home invasion case. Some strides have been made, but a majority of those reforms have been “put on hold” as our state dipped into those funds and essentially has been “robbing Peter to pay Paul” for other programs. Will voir dire be on the priority list of changes with a new Governor at the helm? It is doubtful, as there are other more pressing needs…

We have new language to refer to criminal justice actions in Connecticut. Whether in the marble laden halls and cherry wood meeting rooms of the Legislative Office Building, on street corners or in our hometown newspapers, the term is “before/after Cheshire”, the countrified, sleepy, affluent little town once the home of this author and more recently by the Petit family (in addition to a series of Connecticut Correctional facilities) will have this indelible reputation. Such a legacy no one could have foretold….

Are we serving the best interest of families personally encountering homicide in Connecticut with our current voir dire system? Do we serve those who will be subjected to this system in the future?

Justice delayed… is justice denied when we wait for months and years to have our day in court.


Donna R. Gore, M. A.

Homicide Survivor in Connecticut

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

The Christmas Casseroles Stopped After Two Weeks


By Donna Gore

As the holiday season approaches, those of us who are the veteran survivors of crime are cognizant of the flood of emotions evoked on Thanksgiving, Hanukah, Christmas and the New Year’s holidays… as well as anniversary dates.

Those who have recently been accosted by violent crime, for the first time experience a vacuous holiday season without their loved one.  Holidays that once held meaning, are no more.  Survivors of crime say to them, “What’s the point anymore?”  

New survivors are assaulted with holiday images at every turn.  This year in particular due to our dismal economy, I saw my first Xmas image before the Halloween candy was distributed!

Tinsel and materialism aside, as a new survivor, we don’t want to look at these images or be reminded.   We don’t want to hear “Holly, Jolly Xmas” pervading our grocery aisles.  We cannot face any of it.

At some point it hits us that we have to face the holidays.
They will come no matter what has occurred before.  What to do about that empty seat at the dinner table?  What to do about the gifts you can’t bring yourself to buy and the little rituals your beloved “always took care of.”
Our surviving relatives may be able to function, but we can’t…
Our friends try to “pick up the slack” by offering to “do anything needed.”

“Call if you need anything”.  “Just let me know how I can help” are familiar refrains and certainly well meaning. However, such offers do not help us because they don’t appreciate our state of inertia.  What we really need are concrete suggestions and offers.  Even well meaning friends frequently have no idea how to help during that acute phase.

Therefore, below I present to you a holiday list of “What to Do” from my archives compiled years ago by the Victim Assistance Douglas County Sheriff’s Department in Colorado (with my personal additions and  refinements).

I also offer a list of “Getting through the Holidays,” compliments of Survivors of Homicide, Inc. in Connecticut.  Whether you chose to use any of these suggestions or not, we will always remember our loved one in some way during the holiday season. *** To that end, it is in the establishing of new traditions, even small ones that create new meaning in out lives

HOW CAN I HELP?

1)   Your presence at any public service and a handshake or hug will provide more support than any “rehearsed remarks” that you could possibly think of.

2)   As the friend or relative, you should take the initiative to get in touch by telephone or card.  It’s never too late to express your love and concern.

3)   Don’t say, “Call and let me know how I can help” (Most never will). 
Rather, take the initiative and,
a) Cook a meal;
b) Freeze one for a future meal;
c) Babysit;
d) Do some shopping for them;
e) Help with phone calls;
f) Do some driving ( to the airport, train station etc)

4)   Let them talk… and tell their story over and over again. Listening is the most important support now.  It is in telling the story that survivors are able to begin the long healing process.  Allow them screaming room.

5)   While listening, be careful not to assume feelings, place blame or rationalize reasons for what happened.  You are not there to agree or disagree.  Listen and affirm their right to feel as they do.

6)   Avoid making comments such as:
“You’ll have other children”
“You’ll get married again”
“It was God’s will”
“Be brave”
“Don’t cry”
“Don’t talk about it”
“In time you will have closure”

7)   Accept them for who they are and who they have become.  Your loving support now will help them to accept themselves and come to some sort of peace (NOT CLOSURE) with this loss.

8)   Share some positive memories with the survivors.  Happy and warm memories help the healing process.

9)   Be persistent in your offer of help long term.  It is difficult to ask for help.  The survivor of crime will need your help more and more as the months pass, not less, which is a common mistake.  Everyone wants to bring casseroles for the first two weeks and then they often “go back to their own lives assuming that you “can now “go it alone” which is the farthest thing from truth or reality.

10) Don’t suggest sedatives.  That will only delay the healing process.  It is much better if they can make it through without medication.  However, if needed a doctor should be consulted instead of your medicine cabinet.

11) Be sure to allow the bereaved partner or parent to make the services they wish rather than questioning them on their choices or trying to “take over.”  If not, resentment and anger may occur if their decisions were not respected.  On the other hand, if they ask for specific assistance, follow-through with their requests.

12) Understand that there is no specific timetable for grief! 
Allow them all the time they need to “recover” and begin to function again.  It may take a few months to several years.  Also, keep in mind that grief will reoccur many times. (Particularly during the court/trial process with it’s many delays, postponements etc. known as “the re-victimization.”)

13) Acknowledge anniversary dates such as death dates, their birthdays or anniversaries.  Take their lead in terms of how they will be observed.  A phone call or hug acknowledging the date will offer comfort.  Never ignore
it.

14) Accept their silence if that is all they can offer.  Be patient with them.

15) Comfort the children in the family, not just the adults.  If you are unsure how to approach them or are at a loss of what to say, consult with a professional bereavement therapist or a fellow homicide survivor for advice.  Never lie to children.  However, tell them what they can comprehend and respond to their direct questions without getting too complex or abstract.

16) Avoid halting all conversations with others in their presence.  However, get a feel for what they can handle at the moment.  At times, conversations about other topics or even a funny moment can be a welcome distraction from grief.

17) Allow them to “work trough their grief.”  In other words, do not whisk away photos or clothing. Permit the bereaved to remove such items in their own time.

18) If your relative or friend is in a perpetual state of being overwhelmed and cannot process the day to day conversations, write a letter so that they may read it on their own time and appreciate your relationship at a later time.

19) Encourage postponement of major decisions until the intense grief has
subsided.  Encourage the bereaved to seek advice from clergy, attorneys, real estate personnel so that they are not taken advantage of at their most vulnerable time.

GETTING THROUGH THE HOLIDAYS

You must realize that grieving persons have definite limitations.  We do not function at normal capacity.  Therefore, we must reevaluate our priorities and decide what is really meaningful for our families and us.

1)We must decide what we can handle comfortably, and let those needs be known to family and friends.

-      Whether or not to talk about our loved one openly;
-      Whether we can handle the responsibility of the family dinner. holiday parties etc., or if we wish someone else to take over some or all of these tasks;
-      Whether we will stay here for the holidays or we choose to “run away” to a totally different holiday environment this year;

2) Don’t be afraid to make changes. It really can make things less painful!
- Open presents Christmas #Eve  instead of Christmas morning;
- Have dinner at a different time;
- Attend a different church for your Christmas Eve services;
- Let the children take over decorating the tree or making cookies

3) Our greatest comfort may be in doing something for others.  You may be able to acknowledge your loss more meaningfully by:

-      Giving a gift or money donation in memory of your loved one;
-      Adopting a needy family or guest for the holidays;
-      Volunteering at a shelter or soup kitchen

4)    Whether it’s greeting cards, holiday baking, putting up the tree, decorating, dinner preparations or visiting others, ask these questions before making any decisions:
-      Have I involved or considered my other family members?
-      Do I really enjoy this task or does other family prefer to do it?
-      Can I share or delegate those tasks?
-      Would this Holiday be the same without it?

5)    How many stockings should we hang? We may decide to:
-      Put them all up;
-      Hang no stockings at all;
-      Write our thoughts and feelings down about our loved one and have a special stocking with a designated reader;
-      A family burns a “special candle” on all their special days to quietly include “their presence;”
-      Chose a new tradition among family members to include the one who has passed such as ; hanging a special wreath; buying an item they collected, planting a tree

6)    Plan ahead for the shopping days with a ready made list.  When you have a good day” you will not be as exhausted or shop with a friend and shop at dinnertime when the crowds are much less.

      7)  Holiday cards- If this task is too overwhelming, some families enclose the little funeral service card into your pre-purchased greeting cards for those who may not be aware of your loss.  Ask a friend or relative to make address labels on the computer to help with this task.

Finally, the above suggestions were offered pre technology.  Therefore, someone may want to create a website or Face book page in honor of your loved one….

Respectfully Submitted
Donna R. Gore, M. A.
Homicide Survivor in Connecticut
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Disclaimer

The opinions and information expressed in the individual posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions of each contributor of "Time's Up!" nor the opinion of the blog owner and administrator. The comments are the opinion and property of the individuals who leave them on the posts and do not express the opinion of the authors, contributors or the blog owner and administrator.