Showing posts with label Real Housewives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Real Housewives. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The Mainstreaming of Chaos



By Heidi Hiatt



“Real” housewives.
Bad girls.
Monster-in-laws.
Talk shows.
Tabloid-like court shows.

These are the new soap operas, the modern purveyors of chaos in American society. We have become captivated by hateful, violent, self-indulgent women without boundaries whose every outfit is worth more than the money it would take to feed several small Indian villages for a day. Their earrings are so extravagant that they appear to be chandeliers ripped from the ceiling of a hotel ballroom, and they have more shoes than Imelda Marcos. They overdo “glamour” to the point that it inhibits their natural assets.

If they were reading this, I’m sure I’d instantly be attacked with all manner of foul language and worn-out gems like, “you don’t know me!”, “talk to the hand!”, “you can’t judge me!”, and “how dare you!” No, I don’t know them personally. But I know the juvenile behavior and dysfunction they are spreading on TV, and they should be ashamed. The men who support and encourage this moral decay should be ashamed as well.

Yes, unlike some critics, I have watched a lot of these shows to figure out what the appeal is. I can see how they become addictive, and how some people feel more secure and normal, as one friend put it, after viewing their debauchery. Unfortunately part of these shows’ appeal (and profit) comes from the cycle of violence they engage in.

As in an abusive relationship, there’s a period in which tension builds between the characters, there’s an explosion of violence, and then a honeymoon period in which the characters make up and bond… until tempers flare again. The best thing that could happen to most of the women on these shows is to stay away from each other. Yet they seem addicted to the drama or hooked on the public attention they get for acting like volatile, backstabbing banshees.

The lifestyles of the women on these shows are portrayed as glamorous and exciting. The age-old lie that money can buy you happiness or class is plastered over every episode. Glamorous and exciting is not what I see though. I see pain. I see emptiness. I see wounded little girls who are still struggling through the effects of their parents’ dysfunction and in some cases, their own domestic violence.

It’s terrible that they have to drink so much to cope and brim with hate and anger to the point that they think it’s okay to attack each other physically and emotionally. Instead of stopping the cycle of violence they may have experienced themselves, they are ensuring its survival through normalizing it and showing the world that it is a way of life. They are letting this demon pillage the lives of their own families and encouraging it to thrive in the families of their viewers.

Whether they are survivors of violence or not, this is wrong. Ever since Jerry Springer came out twenty years ago, shows like these have taught young people that it’s normal to sleep with several different partners at once, have an entitlement mentality, not know who your baby’s father is, and expect your woman to come back to you after you’ve beat her up. Yes, these things would happen if there were no TV. But I would argue that their frequency has increased since the armpits of the airwaves like MTV started marketing them as the “real” world.

People, especially younger ones, tend to emulate what they are regularly exposed to. On that note, I began to wonder what possible appeal Jersey Shorecould have to teens and 20-somethings. So I finally forced myself to watch part of an episode. Basically, a bunch of cosmetically-enhanced attention seekers are thrown together in a house to see who will have sex and who will fight. One word says it all: vapid.

Just minutes into my experiment, amidst an alcohol-fueled club scene, one of the male cast members started screaming at one of the females because she wouldn’t do his bidding. He showered her with a string of epithets that were classic domestic violence offender lingo. Not long after, two other characters got into bed together while the others sat in the living room and discussed the seemingly random hookup.

If you asked these characters (or TV execs) what they think their effect on society is, they’d probably point out all the work they do for charity or how viewers want this. They might think of themselves as fashion icons, role models, or the men and women everyone else wants to be. They probably don’t consider or don’t care that their party-all-the-time lifestyles promote domestic abuse, sexual assault, and unwanted children.

Speaking of children, it seems that a lot of the people on these shows have children. I feel so bad for these kids because their parents’ lifestyles revolve around themselves. In many cases the kids seem like little trinkets, fashion accessories that are displayed at strategic times so others will see what “great parents” they are. I wonder how much of a priority these kids are given their parents’ hard-driving, endless adult social schedule.

Even more alarming is the dysfunction and violence these children are exposed to. In these shows dad takes a swing at the uncle, the uncle and his entourage verbally lambast dad with their limited vocabulary of mostly four-letter words, dad stalks the uncle by text, and on it goes. The mothers scream and claw at each other over Christmas presents and allegations of cheating and fraud abound. These poor kids are lacking consistent positive role models who can demonstrate mature behavior without resorting to violence.

There may also be psychological problems at play in some of these programs and there is definitely substance abuse. Some characters on these shows act like poster children for borderline personality disorder and narcissism. These are real disorders that need treatment and are not a joke. They are treated like a joke by these shows. Instead of the people exhibiting such symptoms seeking assessment and treatment, their aggressive behaviors are encouraged and then immortalized in “reunion” episodes.

There are a few women on these shows who seem sincere and genuinely concerned about others. The others seem to be the mean girls from high school, who think they are “all that” and make sure that everyone is mesmerized by their charitable efforts to reach “lesser” folk. That really encapsulates shows likeReal Housewives for me– women who never matured beyond high school. They have a herd mentality and whatever good they do is to promote themselves. They have a deluded view of their own beauty, not realizing how intensely ugly their backstabbing, loose ways make them.

While thinking about this whole “housewives” phenomenon, a verse from the Manufacturer’s Handbook entered my mind that makes the above point better than I can. Proverbs 11:22 says, “Like a gold ring in a pig’s snout is a beautiful woman who shows no discretion.” D’oh! Any questions?

Now I like pigs, but they do tend to get dirty and eat gross things. The author knew exactly what he was saying in this Proverb though and his thought is valid and timeless. These “real” women have a glaring lack of boundaries and continually return to volatile situations they should just stay away from. Some of the fellow cast members they call “friends” are more like two-faced enemies and whatever truces they call don’t last.

Friends are going to have problems from time to time; we’re human. Personally I wouldn’t keep going back to “friends” who are always trying to find fault and tear me down. Friends are there to accept you as you are and build you up. They’re your support network, your shoulder to lean on, your confidantes. They’re good for you.

If your “friends” continually violate your boundaries and/or don’t like you unless you act like them, let them go. That’s not a friend. That’s not respectful. They’re not interested in your success. You’re their entertainment, their punching bag, and their blood supply. They are vampires with empty tanks who try to quench their inner emptiness and feel better about themselves by sucking the life out of you.

There are other Proverbs that describe the self-absorbed, emotionally unbalanced dynamic that makes these shows so popular:

Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses. (Proverbs 27:6)

A quarrelsome wife is like the dripping of a leaky roof in a rainstorm; restraining her is like restraining the wind or grasping oil with the hand. (Proverbs 27:15 & 16)

Better to live on a corner of the roof than share a house with a quarrelsome wife. (Proverbs 21:9)

Those who trust in their riches will fall, but the righteous will thrive like a green leaf. (Proverbs 11:28)

For the lips of the adulterous woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil; but in the end she is bitter as gall, sharp as a double-edged sword. (Proverbs 5:3 & 4)


There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community. (Proverbs 6:16-19)

Better a dry crust with peace and quiet than a house full of feasting, with strife. (Proverbs 17:1)

Seldom set foot in your neighbor’s house— too much of you, and they will hate you. (Proverbs 25:17)



I have a concept for a new TV show using the same cast members, and I might watch it. I’d like to see these people learn proper boundaries and respect. They should also be educated about domestic violence so those who need to can get out of their situations they’re in and stop portraying violent behavior as normal or as something “sophisticated” people do.

Many should learn to prioritize their lives and to be better examples for their children. They should learn to fight back against the dysfunction and denial that engulf them. Some should receive treatment for alcoholism and drug abuse. They need to learn that they don’t need alcohol to have fun or survive a social gathering. They need conflict management skills.

Ultimately, I feel bad for these people. All their showy wealth and social gatherings can’t give them what they really need. They can’t expect other people, or material things, to fill a God-shaped hole in their heart. The acceptance and love they so desperately need isn’t going to come from one more boyfriend, or one more round of holding a drink above their head and shaking their hind end while saying “whoo!” Only their Heavenly Father can do that for them.

I appreciate the material gifts God provides as well as fashion. I’m not a Puritan who dresses in sackcloth and believes deep spirituality only comes from deprivation. I’m not criticizing those who watch these shows but the people on them. I just don’t like how the housewives, monster-in-laws, Kims, Parises, and other attention seekers whose need for fame has kicked into overdrive as they compete for magazine covers and screen time have become “worthy” of imitating.

What these people are doing is teaching a generation of young men and women that violence, abuse, and self-destructive behavior is normal. Their public personas are mainstreaming chaos, and not only is it harming relationships, families, and the self-image of other Americans, it makes our enemies hate us even more.

Normalizing domestic violence, substance abuse, a lack of boundaries, aggressive behavior, mental problems, and standing idly by while others are being abused is fueling an increase in narcissism. It is a rot in the fibers of our society. This “me me me me me me me” crap may be an exciting roller coaster ride of drama, but it’s a setback for women and for civilization. I challenge these reality stars to get public control of their demons and to start reaching out to the lives such chaos destroys.


We live, in fact, in a world starved for solitude, silence, and private: and therefore starved for meditation and true friendship. -C.S. Lewis

Heidi Hiatt, MA recently graduated as a Forensic Psychologist.  You can read more of her posts at her personal blog, Truth, Justice, and All-American Allergen-Free Apple Pie Straight Talk in a Crooked World

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Kudos and Epic Fail



By Susie Kroll

I admit it.  I am willing to admit it.  I watched The Real Housewives of New Jersey.  In this particular episode, a 17-year old girl has hit the point in time when her mother wants to have the “talk” with her.  The mother brings up this idea to her husband.  The father basically states that the girl is a baby and they don’t need to have that conversation with her.  The 17-year old girl is getting ready for a winter formal dance.  The father asked the mother if her parents gave her that “talk” when she was their daughter’s age.  The mother says, “No.”  But she also makes the comment to her husband that times are different from when she was growing up.  The father then says that this isn’t something to bother talking about since the daughter is going to be a virgin until she is married.  The mother saying that she hopes that is what will happen but she still feels like the talk is necessary.  The husband is very resistant to the discussion and the wife then makes a comment that she should have never brought up the topic and just talked to the daughter on her own.  In a different episode, he even got in some guys face that tried to dance with his daughter at a New Year’s Party.  He said his only job was to protect his baby from men like that.  How long does he think he can keep that up before he has to teach her how to be responsible for herself and her needs?   I have a couple of opinions about what I saw in this episode.

First, let me say that I was screaming at the TV, as if I could somehow affect the outcome of what I was seeing.  Let me also say that it ignited a fury of emotions in me as well.  The Kaiser Family foundation conducted at study in 2009 and one of their findings was that 46% of high school students had already had sex.  That is almost half of high school students!  High school usually starts in 9th grade.  I was 14-15 when I started high school.  The daughter on the show is 17.  So somewhere between 14-18, 46% of teens are sexually active.  While she seems like a teen that has her act together, it was incredibly naïve of the father to think that a discussion about sex and relationships isn’t necessary.  17 is too late (but better than never) to have this discussion with their daughter.  His daughter may not have the intention of sleeping around or sleeping with someone in the near future but being prepared and knowing what his daughter is thinking is much more powerful and important that deluding himself into thinking that these thoughts haven’t crossed her mind.  I am not discounting that it might be an uncomfortable subject but parts of life are darn uncomfortable.  As a parent, you signed up for all of it, the good, the bad, the ugly, and the uncomfortable.  The father, during an in-episode interview couldn’t even say sex, he had to spell it out.  If he isn’t comfortable with the idea of saying the word, how can he assume that the daughter is or isn’t?  He is making a bunch of assumptions about his daughter. 

First, even the best of teens don’t tell their parents everything.  To the daughter’s credit, she seems mature and seems to have a good head on her shoulders but even the smartest teen doesn’t know everything about sex and relationships.  Really?!  Most adults don’t either.  This is readily evident by the other “housewives” on the show. 

Her mother had the right idea and I have to give her credit for wanting to talk to her daughter if only to touch base and reinforce their family values and check in with her daughter and where she is mentally.  The mom and daughter, in a later scene, are dress shopping for the winter formal.  The mother makes comments on various dresses as her daughter tries them on.  Finally, the daughter picks a dress and, again I am screaming at the TV.  The dress was floor length, fitted, strapless, and mermaid cut.  Nothing about the dress was too revealing with the exception that it showed her daughter’s figure as it was a very fitted dress.  The mother took that moment to talk to her daughter about what that kind of dress says.  She said that it was a sexy dress and put a message out there to the world.  While I believe it was a necessary discussion and that it needed to happen, the dress shop was not the appropriate venue for said discussion.  Okay, back to why I was screaming.  The mother said that dress is sexy and it will attract a certain type of attention.  In no way shape or form does the way a teen or adult dresses indicate or ask for certain things to happen to them.  The way someone dresses does not make it okay for someone to be assaulted sexually or have unwanted sexual advances happen to them.  I did not like that the mother ways inferring that how her daughter dressed made her somehow responsible for the attention whether negative or positive she received.  Sure the dress was fitted and “sexy” and it probably would make a teenage boy stare.  Let’s be real, teenage boys would stare at a girl with a sack over her head.  It is called teenage hormones.  Parents can build a wall around their children but eventually they will climb over it.  It is so much better to prepare them from life, relationships, and sex rather than thinking you can keep them from them until they are married.

Kudos to mom for wanting to talk to her daughter about sex and boys.  Kudos to mom for having the talk even though the dad was resistant and basically in denial that it needed to happen.  Mild fail to the mom for not having done some research about how, when, and where to have this conversation with her daughter.  Epic fail to the dad for thinking that his daughter has a perfect handle on relationships, sex, and what a healthy relationship looks like at the age of 17.  Epic fail to the dad for failing to protect his daughter by supporting his wife and preparing his daughter for the eventuality of a relationship and/or sex, whether it happens before or after she is married.  Epic fail to both parents for exposing their daughter and her fragile youth to the damages of being on reality TV.

Knowing about healthy relationships and sex doesn’t automatically pop into your head once you are married.  Married doesn’t equal “Everything is healthy and safe now.”  I know plenty of adults that are in very unhealthy marriages and relationships.  So when do they learn about it?  How about we all start early and teach proactively instead of reactively!    

While I do not think that the “Real Housewives” franchise is the best indicator of how teens learn about relationships and sex, I do realize that if we aren’t teaching our teens and tweens where are they going to learn?   From their peers?  From the media?  From reality TV?  If not you, then who?  Do you want to take the chance that their best relationship/sex model and lessons comes from one of those? I hope not.  

Susie Kroll is available for presentations and workshops in your school or organization.  Learn more about Susie at www.susiekroll.com and read her blog Teach Our Teens & Save Their Lives
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Disclaimer

The opinions and information expressed in the individual posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions of each contributor of "Time's Up!" nor the opinion of the blog owner and administrator. The comments are the opinion and property of the individuals who leave them on the posts and do not express the opinion of the authors, contributors or the blog owner and administrator.