Beau and Calyx Shenecker |
by Guest Writer, Diane Fanning
Two years ago today, Julie
Schenecker used a handgun to end the lives of her children, 16-year-ol
Calyx and 13-year-old Beau. To obtain
that firearm, she lied. She filled out a
form at the gun shop denying that she’d ever been committed to an institution
for mental health reasons and she swore she was not addicted to any drugs.
Julie Schenecker is an obvious example of why it is
essential to have universal background checks that include accurate input from
mental health professionals as well as criminal records for every single
transfer of gun ownership.
In Newtown,
a young man mowed down 20 six-year-old children and five school staff
members. Using a Bushmaster with a
massive ammunition clip, he riddled the tiny, helpless bodies of first graders
with bullets. It was his mother’s gun,
legally obtained.
Why do some believe that their right to have fun firing off
these lethal weapons designed for mass killing is more important than the lives
of our children? Every right we have as
Americans has its limitations—not to curtail our liberty—but to provide equal
protection under the law for all of our citizens.
Before Australia
banned these assault weapons and clips, they averaged a mass murder every
year. Since then, they have had none—not
one. Weapons designed to kill as many as
possible in a short period of time have no place in a civil society.
This past week in Texas, gunfire erupted at Lone
Star College. Three were wounded,
many were terrified, the campus was locked down. A contributing factor to traumatic experience
was the insistence of state leaders that faculty and students should be allowed
to carry concealed weapons when they go to their schools.
The laissez-faire attitude my state and others have toward
responsible, reasonable gun regulations have directly contributed to deaths of
its citizens. The more guns there are in
the public square, the more likely the incidence of gun violence.
I understand and accept the strong multi-generational ties
to hunting. I would not advocate for
abolishing those weapons. I understand
the psychological need for others to possess handguns in their homes to protect
their families, even though, statistically, it is far more likely that weapon
will be used to take the life of someone in that house than it will ever be
used to defend their personal safety. I
am not suggesting that this right should be taken away.
But one of every two women killed by gunfire dies at the
hand of an intimate partner. States that
have adopted laws mandating that all gun ownership exchanges—even private gun sales
require background checks—have seen a 40 per
cent drop in this lethal form of domestic violence. Is this minor inconvenience more troublesome
than the loss of these women’s lives?
I acknowledge the fear of some Americans that there is a
slippery slope—that if we ban one weapon, add one caveat to purchase
restrictions, soon the government will take every firearm we own. The
Supreme Court, however, has taken a stand and marked this territory as
sacrosanct. There is a right to the
individual ownership of guns. The
slippery slope exists only in the minds of the paranoid, the fanatical and
those who have been misled by fear mongers.
It is time to ignore those voices whose purpose in speaking
out is only to frighten our fellow Americans.
It is time for all of us to speak up and make it clear that we value the
lives of children more than some adult’s recreational pleasure. It is time to stand up for human life.
Diane Fanning is the
author of Sleep My
Darlings, the story of the Schenecker
tragedy, coming April 30. It will be
Diane’s twentieth published book.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be added shortly.