tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post4380229327665793749..comments2024-03-19T02:43:07.969-04:00Comments on "Time's Up!": Why Don’t We End Domestic Violence?Time's Uphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09908111385466002389noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-2555195111734767832013-08-07T14:43:05.576-04:002013-08-07T14:43:05.576-04:00Abusers are often connected to the shadow governme...Abusers are often connected to the shadow government & as such are protected by it. My experience is that most of the real problems lie with corruption at every level & sector of society. These perpetrators know exactly what they are doing & they enjoy the covert control they exercise over their ex-partners, children, families & communities. The corrupt shadow government has deeply infiltrated the legal systemal system. As such perpetrators are protected & victims terrorized. No expense is too great nor scheme or scam too far out in the control & torment of victims. Extensive slander, perjury, legal & medical abuses & worst of all proxy organized stalking, the gift that never stops giving, are all frequently used weapons in the shadow government connected abusers arsenal. I even had a pro father's right family court judges nephew court & date me prior to losing custody & having my life completely destroyed. No excuse is off limits when it is time to support & fund the victims. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-90058858613498317922011-06-26T21:26:02.825-04:002011-06-26T21:26:02.825-04:00Pardon me, as to Richard Fine, that was 18 months,...Pardon me, as to Richard Fine, that was 18 months, not yrs. <br />http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Blogs/96.php?page=6<br /><br />How to Disqualify your Judge (this is Calif, if they were on the take from the County). However wouldn't the same principle apply when it is a child support matter, and any CS attorney has been involved? Other county employees that might be involved in cases include county-paid mediators, or any recipients of a variety of program funds, such as access/visitation and others (designed to increase noncustodial parenting time). <br /><br />Many of the things that happened to this man have also happened to moms (although I don't know one who went to solitary confinement for 18 months). That he was punished so hard tells me he was close to the mark. I believe that if we will spend some time figuring out which end is up, the perspective will change from docile and afraid to indignant, informed, and activitist; taxation without representation is unacceptable. Anyone else you know that discovered about $14 million of child support moneys sitting in a DA's office (to collect interest) instead of being distributed to children. Begin to understand this, and basic greed, and I think some issues will be less gender-specific (in the big picture) than we realized. Dads are also betrayed in many of these programs, too - it's a form of extortion. <br /><br />The proper place for mental health professionals "in" the courts is OUT of them, but that would take a real restructuring, or perhaps boycott, to fix. Again, information is key...<br /><br />http://sites.google.com/site/freerichardfine/Home/best-courts-money-could-buy<br /><br />Have a nice day.Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10427274618057694494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-32157881935866748612011-06-26T21:11:13.976-04:002011-06-26T21:11:13.976-04:00Anonymous is right. Let's not be babes in the...Anonymous is right. Let's not be babes in the woods about these matters any more. <br /><br />After several attempts to post, I decided to just respond (it's very informative!) on my blog http://familycourtmatters.wordpress.com. Am known as a long-winded grants researcher (and DV/family court survivor) who outs systems such as AFCC or DV groups that are actually selling out to the federal grants stream, without informing domestic violence victims of this.<br /><br />The system is NOT -- really, it simply is NOT -- too hard to understand, once a person is able to process emotionally, at a gut level, that there really, truly are callous and often corrupt people in high places, and that a decades-old strategy of changing the character of the courts has been in place, set by various policy makers and their organizations. <br /><br />A lot of this is possible because of the internet, and others because of the strong-arm of the IRS & Child Support System (both of which can garnish wages and put people -- moms or dads -- in jail) giving a pool of federal funds in the billions (literally) that various groups scramble for -- whether nonprofits associated with the courts (primarily) or university-based (or, just even web-based) "Institutes" that take money to re-circulate the same (old) dogma about domestic violence.<br /><br />Yesterday, I emailed the leader of a major (very major) DV organization that's been around since about the 70s & 80s, asking her pointedly why no one was publicizing the role of the AFCC in the courts, the role of the child support system in enabling case-steering (fatherhood grants system) and what good all this training was supposedly doing. <br /><br />As the person was in charge of some major VAWA funding, and we'd spoken before, I said I am a member of the public and the clients your grants-funded train-the-trainers series are allegedly serving. What evidence do you have that any of this is happening, and on what basis have you failed to include feedback from CURRENT street-level mothers who lost their kids to batterers or molesters about how this happened?<br /><br />And why (I said) do your trainings systematically omit critical elements -- known for over a decade now -- to make it almost impossible for a mother with kids & a protective order to actually retain custody, or separate from her abuser? -- because the existence of AFCC's agenda is in direct opposition to what you are training people on? With our tax $$...<br /><br />I also said, what's with the two-tier class system in this field? Grantee recipients versus litigants/parents... Received the brush-off, but will be following up.... There's a reason they are so urgent to train everyone -- and censor what can and cannot be on the training curricula. AFCC/CRC connection to incest and pedophile behavior is most definitely "off." <br /><br />Best education is self-initiated and self-directed, choosing among the most reasonable options. What the Coalitations against DV are doing, presently, is eliminating non-mainstream voices. They have done this by grabbing the majority of the VAWA based grants. Actual reform will have to come from informed, and empowered parents. The power comes when you know who has been paying your judge, your mediator, your whatnot - and you as a citizen inform the court (with payment receipts in hand) that this is unacceptable and XYZ is off the case.<br /><br />Richard Fine (google) has some tools for doing this, and as he just spent 18 yrs in jail in retaliation for exposing the money trail in Los Angeles (where AFCC began), I feel I owe it to him and others to not let that go to waste. If this is our country, these are our public servants. Period.<br /><br />Visit my blog for another point of view. I'm with Anon, here and provide more details.Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10427274618057694494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-4828780032882823112011-06-26T19:05:52.217-04:002011-06-26T19:05:52.217-04:00One very important factor that must be addressed i...One very important factor that must be addressed is that ...there is enormous misinformation about the training of judges and court staff. Most communities today do have DV training and at great expense to taxpayers. The real problem is that the AFCC - Assoc of Family Conciliation Courts is pretty much a secret society that holds themselves out to be the "experts to train the judges & officers of the courts" and the AFCC is a pedophile, incest, & misogyny promoting organization that adopted the Alfred Kinsey Coverup & Richard Gardner's psychotic creation PAS - parental alienation syndrome. The AFCC holds meetings to train courts staff everywhere and many officers of the courts including the appellate courts are members of the AFCC. Thus there is significant conflict of interest contributing to the custody switching trend as well as the fact that the Fatherhood funding streams provides a serious gravy train for the children to be thrown to the wolves!! <br /><br />Time to tell the Obama Admin to put an end to the madness & stop appeasing the people with junk programs like the OVW. We need the government to focus on law enforcement & holding bad judges accountable ....and to stop wasting taxpayers money!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-49831070223277541582011-06-20T14:00:13.039-04:002011-06-20T14:00:13.039-04:00well written. I noticed Diane Garnick’s status on ...well written. I noticed Diane Garnick’s status on facebook today and it seems to tie into what you are saying. https://www.facebook.com/DianeGarnick<br /><br />Your actions teach people how to treat you. Human nature leads people to do as much as they can get away with. Stand up for yourself. You deserve it. -Diane GarnickAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-13853386091589120352011-06-20T13:11:01.124-04:002011-06-20T13:11:01.124-04:00What to do about the reckless use of "supervi...What to do about the reckless use of "supervising" protective parents and making us pay supervised visitation for trying to get the very evidentiary hearings you write about? Either there is a an alleged crime (physical or sexual assault) and that should be brought immediately to district court, or its not a contested custody case and can be handled through a robust civil court like superior - which follows rules and can get to summary judgment on divorce, custody and visitation pretty quickly. That means, we get to save even MORE money and abolish Family Court altogether - leaving only the juvenile court for minors who themselves have a run in with the law or some other delinquency. <br /><br />Supervised visitation has been used a legal weapon, often at the behest of the very "mental health" professionals you say need to be removed, because they write in and say anxiety, depression or what have you is "psychologically harming" the child - when those mental difficulties would ameliorate if the stress of litigation was resolved more quickly instead of week after week, month after month. Or in my case - i need to be supervised and pay for the privilege, because I was found to get "wound up" - that was the finding of fact which posed a "danger" and "possible imminent psychological harm" to my 14 year old. My getting wound up the first 13 years did alarm anyone; just the inverse false allegation of fear on my ex that I pose imminent harm and should be the one to be supervised to deflect the case AND my daughter's preference (which was to live with me). So they did the opposite. You know the story. Federal money comes in to the states under these CAVA grants with one objective: increased access and visitation for parents. Well that's easy to do by giving them one hour a week. All you have to do if first STRIP them of custody. Put them in a falsely obtained No-contact or TRO so that they now have ZERO access and visitation and VOILA! order supervision, put them in the program - and the report the successful uptick in numbers of people served, and increase per person (from zero to 1 or 2 hour per week) of access and visitation. Get more grant money. Our program in RI is so successful - there is a WAITING list for the parents who are court-ordered to supervision (mostly mothers) to get their one hour a week visit at the courthouse hallway! So you have zero zero zero zero zero while you wait for an opening in the schedule to be supervised for your "one hour". Nice. Thats success.Patrice Livingstonnoreply@blogger.com