tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post7921170168915772415..comments2024-03-19T02:43:07.969-04:00Comments on "Time's Up!": Tunnel Vision Deja VuTime's Uphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09908111385466002389noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6032288097291902285.post-80334006335855645312010-05-28T09:19:31.822-04:002010-05-28T09:19:31.822-04:00Perhaps the author's views on tunnel vision is...Perhaps the author's views on tunnel vision is correct but one thing I do know. (In reference to the confirmation bias) When I listen to a trial, or read about evidence against a person, I do so knowing that, if it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt to be truth, I am willing to admit my previously wrong impressions. <br /><br />To me, jurors have to do much the same when they hear both sides of the arguments. They form one opinion during states case and another during defense. They form one opinion during state's questioning of witnesses and another during defense questioning. And again when they are in a jury room discussing the case.<br /><br />So how does my willingness to rethink my previous assumptions and the jurors going back and forth meet the discounting anything that challenges the original beliefs in the confirmation bias of tunnel vision? Or does his view limit the information to LE and justice system. Law enforcement officers are human just like the public at large so wouldn't they think and rethink also?TigressPenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10486657532479733143noreply@blogger.com